Jordan’s response to questions about the disappeared Turkish-Emirati dual national Khalaf al-Romaithi have only raised further queries, say the MP who posed the questions, Romaithi’s lawyer and rights groups.

Romaithi, 58, was detained in Amman on 7 May after an iris scan at Queen Alia Airport revealed an Emirati warrant for his arrest. He was initially released on bail, but then later arrested by plainclothed police officers, and was due to have his case heard in court on 16 May.

After an initial court hearing on 9 May, Romaithi has not been seen by his lawyers and family.

A week later, Emirati state media reported that he had been “received” in the UAE. A Turkish official told interested parties that Romaithi was taken by a private plane to the UAE on 12 May.

But neither his exact whereabouts, nor how he ended up in the UAE have been clarified publicly by the UAE, Jordan or Turkey, who have remained silent on the topic – until the release this week of answers to parliamentary questions raised by Jordanian MP Adnan Mashuqa in May. 

Among a list of queries, Mashuqa had asked the prime minister’s office how it was possible that Romaithi had been extradited to the UAE without a court decision in Jordan. 

The justice ministry responded with a five-page letter released on Tuesday, with one line about Romaithi: “No extradition request was received from the Ministry of Justice concerning the citizen Khalaf al-Romaithi to date.”

Both Mashuqa and Romaithi’s lawyer, Asim al-Omari, told Middle East Eye that the response was insufficient and asked why, when questions were posed to the prime minister’s office, only the justice ministry had responded.

“The response of the Ministry of Justice was evasive,” Omari told MEE. “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Interior must respond because they have roles according to the law in the agreement signed between Jordan and the UAE in 1999.”

The 1999 agreement, which stipulates how the two countries cooperate legally, says that nationals arrested in the other country who are wanted for political issues should not be handed over, but also says that terrorism is not considered political.

These points are particularly relevant for the case of Romaithi who was convicted in 2013 in a mass trial dubbed the UAE94.

Rights groups have widely criticised the trial as grossly unfair and political in nature, while UAE authorities maintain that Romaithi and others convicted in the case are terrorists.

Last week, UN experts warned that the Arab Interior Ministers Council, an Arab League security body that circulated the UAE’s warrant for Romaithi, is failing to shield people who are wanted for political activities from extradition.

The experts pointed, in particular, to concerns over the conflation of political activities and terrorism in the laws of some member states.

Hamad al-Shamsi, a friend of Romaithi’s who runs the Emirates Detainees Advocacy Centre, said he also found the ministry’s response problematic and that it suggested to him that the government knows it violated international and even Jordanian laws.

“However, it is crucial for the Jordanian government to understand that these responses do not absolve them of their responsibility regarding Al-Romaithi as it was the government that detained him,” he told MEE. 

“We are discussing a state where the rule of law should prevail. How can someone simply disappear and everyone involved evades responsibility? The judiciary claims no knowledge, and the government echoes the same words.”

He added that the judiciary’s lack of awareness suggests that his friend’s case was handled entirely by the security services of both countries, and raised questions about Emirati influence on Jordan and its ability to transform sovereign ministries into “tools for carrying out kidnapping”.